There has been a resurrection of the sexual harassment charge against Justice Clarence Thomas that was brought by Anita Hill. Jay Kaganoff of the Washington Post takes up the torch and attacks the Justice and compares him to the current spate of reveals that are going on. He wants Justice Thomas to resign. That dog will not hunt. There are no comparisons. Here is what you need to consider in the Court of Public Convictions.
As Written By Jazz Shaw for Hot Air:
It’s not the first time I’ve heard it, but after reading this op-ed from Jay Kaganoff in the Washington Post, I’m guessing we’ll be seeing more of it. After the cacophony of calls for Hollywood moguls and media figures to lose their jobs and elected officials to resign or be removed following allegations of sexual assault and harassment, it was inevitable that Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas’ name would eventually come up.
Kaganoff titles his piece, Fellow conservatives, it’s time to call on Clarence Thomas to resign. The author makes at least a partially convincing case, depending on where you personally set the bar for convictions in the Court of Public Opinion. If allegations which can’t or won’t …read more
Source:: Allen West Republic